Athabasca Oil Sands

Historysands and fuel to extract the crude.
The Athabasca oil sands are named after theOil prices 1996-2008 (not adjusted for inflation)
Athabasca River which cuts through the heart ofIn mid-2006, the National Energy Board of Canada
the deposit, and traces of the heavy oil areestimated the operating cost of a new mining
readily observed on the river banks. Historically,operation in the Athabasca oil sands to be C$9 to
the bitumen was used by the indigenous Cree andC$12 per barrel, while the cost of an in-situ SAGD
Dene Aboriginal peoples to waterproof theiroperation (using dual horizontal wells) would be
canoes. The oil deposits are located within theC$10 to C$14 per barrel. This compares to
boundaries of Treaty 8, and several First Nationsoperating costs for conventional oil wells which can
of the area are involved with the sands.range from less than one dollar per barrel in Iraq
Athabasca oil sands on the banks of the river, c.and Saudi Arabia to over six in the United States
1900and Canada's conventional oil reserves.
The Athabasca oil sands first came to theThe capital cost of the equipment required to
attention of European fur traders in 1719 whenmine the sands and haul it to processing is a
Wa-pa-su, a Cree trader, brought a sample ofmajor consideration in starting production. The
bituminous sands to the Hudson's Bay CompanyNEB estimates that capital costs raise the total
post at York Factory on Hudson Bay wherecost of production to C$18 to C$20 per barrel for
Henry Kelsey was the manager. In 1778, Petera new mining operation and C$18 to C$22 per
Pond, another fur trader and a founder of thebarrel for a SAGD operation. This does not include
rival North West Company, became the firstthe cost of upgrading the crude bitumen to
European to see the Athabasca deposits aftersynthetic crude oil, which makes the final costs
discovering the Methye Portage which allowedC$36 to C$40 per barrel for a new mining
access to the rich fur resources of theoperation.
Athabasca River system from the Hudson BayTherefore, although high crude prices make the
watershed.cost of production very attractive, sudden drops
In 1788, fur trader Alexander MacKenzie (whoin price leaves producers unable to recover their
later discovered routes to both the Arctic andcapital costslthough the companies are well
Pacific Oceans from this area) wrote: "At aboutfinanced and can tolerate long periods of low
24 miles (39 km) from the fork (of theprices since the capital has already been spent
Athabasca and Clearwater Rivers) are someand they can typically cover incremental operating
bituminous fountains into which a pole of 20 feetcosts.
(6.1 m) long may be inserted without the leastHowever, the development of commercial
resistance. The bitumen is in a fluid state andproduction is made easier by the fact that
when mixed with gum, the resinous substanceexploration costs are very low. Such costs are a
collected from the spruce fir, it serves to gummajor factor when assessing the economics of
the Indians' canoes." He was followed in 1799 bydrilling in a traditional oil field. The location of the oil
map maker David Thompson and in 1819 bydeposits in the oil sands are well known, and an
British Naval officer Sir John Franklin.estimate of recovery costs can usually be made
Sir John Richardson did the first geologicaleasily. There is not another region in the world
assessment of the oil sands in 1848 on his waywith energy deposits of comparable magnitude
north to search for Franklin's lost expedition. Thewhere it would be less likely that the installations
first government-sponsored survey of the oilwould be confiscated by a hostile national
sands was initiated in 1875 by John Macoun, and ingovernment, or be endangered by a war or
1883, G.C. Hoffman of the Geological Survey ofrevolution.
Canada tried separating the bitumen from oil sandAs a result of the oil price increases since 2003,
with the use of water and reported that itthe economics of oil sands have improved
separated readily. In 1888, Dr. Robert Bell, thedramatically. At a world price of US$50 per barrel,
director of the Geological Survey of Canada,the NEB estimated an integrated mining operation
reported to a Senate Committee that "Thewould make a rate return of 16 to 23%, while a
evidence ... points to the existence in theSAGD operation would return 16 to 27%. Prices
Athabasca and Mackenzie valleys of the mostsince 2006 have risen, exceeding US$145 in mid
extensive petroleum field in America, if not the2008. As a result, capital expenditures in the oil
world."sands announced for the period 2006 to 2015 are
In 1926, Dr. Karl Clark of the University of Albertaexpected to exceed C$100 billion, which is twice
perfected a hot water separation process whichthe amount projected as recently as 2004.
became the basis of today's thermal extractionHowever, because of an acute labour shortage
process. Several attempts to implement it hadwhich has developed in Alberta, it is not likely that
varying degrees of success, but it was 1967all these projects can be completed.
before the first commercially viable operationAt present the area around Fort McMurray has
began with the opening of the Great Canadian Oilseen the most effect from the increased activity
Sands (now Suncor) plant using surfactants in thein the oil sands. Although jobs are plentiful, housing
separation process developed by Dr. Earl W.is in short supply and expensive. People seeking
Malmberg of Sun Oil Company.work often arrive in the area without arranging
Oil sands productionaccommodation, driving up the price of temporary
Commercial production of oil from the Athabascaaccommodation. The area is isolated, with only a
oil sands began in 1967, when Great Canadian Oiltwo-lane road connecting it to the rest of the
Sands Limited (then a subsidiary of Sun Oilprovince, and there is pressure on the
Company but now an independent companygovernment of Alberta to improve road links as
known as Suncor Energy) opened its first mine,well as hospitals and other infrastructure.
producing 30,000 barrels per day (4,800 m3/d)Despite the best efforts of companies to move
of synthetic crude oil. Development was inhibitedas much of the construction work as possible out
by declining world oil prices, and the second mine,of the Fort McMurray area, and even out of
operated by the Syncrude consortium, did notAlberta, the shortage of skilled workers is
begin operating until 1978, after the 1973 oil crisisspreading to the rest of the province.. Even
sparked investor interest. However, the price ofwithout the oil sands, the Alberta economy would
oil subsided afterwards, and although the 1979be very strong, but development of the oil sands
energy crisis caused oil prices to peak again,has resulted in the strongest period of economic
introduction of the National Energy Program bygrowth ever recorded by a Canadian province.
Pierre Trudeau discouraged foreign investment inGeopolitical importance
the Canadian oil industry. During the 1980s, oilThe Athabasca Oil Sands are now featured
prices declined to very low levels, causingprominently in international trade talks, with
considerable retrenchment in the oil industry, andenergy rivals China and the United States
the third mine, operated by Shell Canada, did notnegotiating with Canada for a bigger share of the
begin operating until 2003. However, as a result ofoil sands' rapidly increasing output. Output at the oil
oil price increases since 2003, the existing minessands is expected to quadruple between 2005
have been greatly expanded and new ones areand 2015, reaching 4 million bbl/day, increasing
being planned.their political and economic importance. Currently
According to the Alberta Energy and Utilitiesmost of the oil sands production is exported to
Board, 2005 production of crude bitumen in thethe United States.
Athabasca oil sands was as follows:An agreement has been signed between
2005 Productionm3/daybbl/dayPetroChina and Enbridge to build a
Suncor Mine400,000 barrels per day (64,000 m3/d) pipeline
31,000from Edmonton, Alberta, to the west coast port
195,000of Kitimat, British Columbia, to export synthetic
Syncrude Minecrude oil from the oil sands to China and
41,700elsewhere in the Pacific, plus a
262,000150-million-barrel-per-day (24,000,000 m3/d)
Shell Canada Minepipeline running the other way to import
26,800condensate to dilute the bitumen so it will flow.
169,000Sinopec, China's largest refining and chemical
In Situ Projectscompany, and China National Petroleum
21,300Corporation have bought or are planning to buy
134,000shares in major oil sands development.
TOTALOn August 20, 2009, the U.S. State Department
120,800issued a presidential permit for an Alberta Clipper
760,000Pipeline that will run from Hardisty, Alberta to
As of 2006, output of oil sands production hadSuperior, Wisconsin. The pipeline will be capable of
increased to 1.126 million barrels per daycarrying up to 450,000 barrels of crude oil a day
(179,000 m3/d). Oil sands were the source offrom the Athabasca Oil Sands to U.S. refineries.
62% of Alberta's total oil production and 47% ofIndigenous peoples of the area
all oil produced in Canada. The Alberta governmentIndigenous peoples of the area include the Fort
believes this level of production could reachMcKay First Nation. The oil sands themselves are
3 Mbbl/d (480,000 m3/d) by 2020 and possiblylocated within the boundaries of Treaty 8, signed
5 Mbbl/d (790,000 m3/d) by 2030.in 1899. The Fort McKay First Nation has formed
Future productionseveral companies to service the oil sands
As of December 2008, the Canadian Associationindustry and will be developing a mine on their
of Petroleum Producers revised its 2008-2020territory. Opposition remaining within the First
crude oil forecasts to account for projectNation focuses on environmental stewardship
cancellations and cutbacks as a result of the priceissues.
declines in the second half of 2008. The revisedOil sand companies
forecast predicted that Canadian oil sandsPlanned mining operation oil production by various
production would continue to grow, but at acompanies. Data from table below.
slower rate than previously predicted. ThereThere are currently three large oil sands mining
would be minimal changes to 2008-2012operations in the area run by Syncrude Canada
production, but by 2020 production could beLimited, Suncor Energy and Albian Sands owned
300,000 barrels per day (48,000 m3/d) lessby Shell Canada, Chevron, and Marathon Oil Corp.
than its prior predictions. This would mean thatMajor producing or planned developments in the
Canadian oil sands production would grow fromAthabasca Oil Sands include the following projects:
1.2 million barrels per day (190,000 m3/d) inSuncor Energy's Steepbank and Millennium mines
2008 to 3.3 million barrels per day (520,000 m3currently produce 263,000 barrels per day
d) in 2020, and that total Canadian oil production(41,800 m3/d) and its Firebag in-situ project
would grow from 2.7 to 4.1 million barrels per dayproduces 35,000 bbl/d (5,600 m3/d). It intends
(430,000 to 650,000 m3/d) in 2020. Evento spend 3.2 billion to expand its mining operations
accounting for project cancellations, this wouldto 400,000 bbl/d (64,000 m3/d) and its in-situ
place Canada among the four or five largestproduction to 140,000 bbl/d (22,000 m3/d) by
oil-producing countries in the world by 2020.2008.
In early December 2007, London based BP andSyncrude's Mildred Lake and Aurora mines
Calgary based Husky Energy announced a 50/50currently can produce 360,000 bbl/d (57,000 m3
joint venture to produce and refine bitumen fromd).
the Athabasca oil sands. BP would contribute itsShell Canada currently operates its Muskeg River
Toledo, Ohio refinery to the joint venture, whileMine producing 155,000 bbl/d (24,600 m3/d) and
Husky would contribute its Sunrise oil sandsthe Scotford Upgrader at Fort Saskatchewan,
project. Sunrise was planned to start producingAlberta. Shell intends to open its new Jackpine
60,000 barrels per day (9,500 m3/d) of bitumenmine and expand total production to 500,000 bbl
in 2012 and may reach 200,000 bbl/d (30,000 m3d (79,000 m3/d) over the next few years.
d) by 2015-2020. BP would modify its ToledoNexen's in-situ Long Lake SAGD project is now
refinery to process 170,000 bbl/d (27,000 m3/d)producing 70,000 bbl/d (11,000 m3/d). Plans to
of bitumen directly to refined products. The jointexpand it to 240,000 bbl/d (38,000 m3/d) have
venture would solve problems for bothbeen made. Expansion plans were delayed in early
companies, since Husky was short of refining2009.
capacity, and BP had no presence in the oil sands.CNRL's $8 billion Horizon mine is planned to
It was a change of strategy for BP, since theproduce 110,000 bbl/d (17,000 m3/d) on startup
company historically has downplayed thein mid 2009 and grow to 300,000 bbl/d
importance of oil sands.(48,000 m3/d) by 2010.
In mid December 2007, ConocoPhillips announcedTotal S.A.'s subsidiary Deer Creek Energy is
its intention to increase its oil sands productionoperating a SAGD project on its Joslyn lease,
from 60,000 barrels per day (9,500 m3/d) toproducing 10,000 bbl/d (1,600 m3/d). It intends
1 million barrels per day (160,000 m3/d) overon constructing its mine by 2010 to expand its
the next 20 years, which would make it theproduction by 100,000 bbl/d (16,000 m3/d).
largest private sector oil sands producer in theImperial Oil's 5 to 8 billion Kearl Oil Sands Project is
world. ConocoPhillips currently holds the largestprojected to start construction in 2008 and
position in the Canadian oil sands with over 1produce 100,000 bbl/d (16,000 m3/d) by 2010.
million acres (4000 km2) under lease. OtherImperial also operates a 160,000 bbl/d
major oil sands producers planning to increase(25,000 m3/d) in-situ operation in the Cold Lake
their production include Royal Dutch Shell (tooil sands region.
770,000 bbl/d (122,000 m3/d); Syncrude CanadaSynenco Energy and SinoCanada Petroleum Corp.,
(to 550,000 bbl/d (87,000 m3/d); Suncor Energya subsidiary of Sinopec, China's largest oil refiner,
(to 500,000 bbl/d (79,000 m3/d) and Canadianhad agreed to create the 3.5 billion Northern Lights
Natural Resources (to 500,000 bbl/d (79,000 m3mine, projected to produce 100,000 bbl/d
d). If all these plans come to fruition, these five(16,000 m3/d) by 2009. This project has since
companies will be producing over 3.3 million bbl/dbeen indefinitely deferred (as of 2007).
(500,000 m3/d) of oil from oil sands by 2028.North American Oil Sands Corporation (NAOSC), a
Major Athabasca Oil Sands Projects (as ofsubsidiary of Statoil, is expected to produce in the
December 2007)Kai Kos Dehseh project around 100,000 bbl/d
Project Name(16,000 m3/d) by 2015. It is expected to ramp
Typeup production to around 100,000 barrels per day
Major Partners(16,000 m3/d) by around 2015.
NationalMining Projects
AffiliationOperator
2007 ProductionProject
(barrels/day)Phase
Planned ProductionCapacity
(barrels/day)Start-up
SuncorRegulatory Status
Primarily MiningRoyal Dutch Shell
Suncor EnergyJackpine
Canada1A
239,100100,000 bbl/d (16,000 m3/d)
500,0002010
SyncrudeUnder construction
Mining 
Syncrude1B
Canada (some USA)100,000 bbl/d (16,000 m3/d)
307,0002012
550,000Approved
Albian Sands 
Mining2
Shell(60%), Chevron(20%), Marathon(20%)100,000 bbl/d (16,000 m3/d)
UK/Netherlands, USA2014
136,000Applied for
770,000Muskeg River
MacKay RiverExisting
SAGD155,000 bbl/d (24,600 m3/d)
Petro-Canada2002
CanadaOperating
  30,000 
190,000Expansion
Fort Hills115,000 bbl/d (18,300 m3/d)
Mining2010
Petro-Canada(60%), UTS Energy(20%),Approved
Teck(20%)Pierre River
Canada1
 100,000 bbl/d (16,000 m3/d)
140,0002018
Foster Creek, Christina LakeApplied for
SAGD 
EnCana Energy(50%), ConocoPhillips(50%)2
Canada, USA100,000 bbl/d (16,000 m3/d)
    6,0002021
400,000Applied for
SurmontCanadian Natural Resources
SAGDHorizon
Total S.A.(50%),ConocoPhillips(50%)1
France, USA135,000 bbl/d (21,500 m3/d)
193,0002009
HangingstoneOperating
SAGD 
Japan Canada Oil Sands (JACOS)2 and 3
Japan135,000 bbl/d (21,500 m3/d)
    8,0002011
  30,000Approved
Long Lake 
SAGD4
Nexen(65%), OPTI Canada(35%)145,000 bbl/d (23,100 m3/d)
Canada2015
240,000Announced
Horizon 
Mining and in situ5
Canadian Natural Resources Limited162,000 bbl/d (25,800 m3/d)
Canada2017
500,000Announced
Jackfish I and IIImperial Oil
SAGDKearl
Devon Energy1
USA100,000 bbl/d (16,000 m3/d)
 ??2010
  70,000Approved
Northern Lights 
Mining2
Total S.A.(60%), Sinopec(40%)100,000 bbl/d (16,000 m3/d)
France, China2012
100,000Approved
Kearl 
Mining3
Imperial Oil, ExxonMobil100,000 bbl/d (16,000 m3/d)
USA2018
300,000Approved
SunrisePetro Canada
SAGDFort Hills
Husky Energy(50%), BP(50%)1
Canada, UK165,000 bbl/d (26,200 m3/d)
200,0002011
TuckerApproved
SAGD debottleneck
Husky Energy25,000 bbl/d (4,000 m3/d)
CanadaTBD
 ??Approved
30,000Suncor Energy
Oil Sands ProjectMillenium
Mining and SAGD 
Total S.A. (76%), Oxy (15%), Inpex (10%)294,000 bbl/d (46,700 m3/d)
France, USA, Japan1967
225,000Operating
Ells River debottleneck
SAGD23,000 bbl/d (3,700 m3/d)
Chevron(60%), Marathon(20%), Shell(20%)2008
USA, UK/NetherlandsUnder construction
100,000Steepbankdebottleneck
Terre de Grace4,000 bbl/d (640 m3/d)
SAGD2007
Value Creation IncUnder construction
Canada extension
300,000 
Kai Kos Dehseh2010
SAGDApproved
StatoilVoyageur South
Norway1
200,000120,000 bbl/d (19,000 m3/d)
Black Gold Mine2012
Mining?Applied for
Korea National Oil CorporationSyncrude
KoreaMildred Lake & Aurora
  30,0001 and 2
Total290,700 bbl/d (46,220 m3/d)
726,1001978
5,068,000   Operating
Development 
The key characteristic of the Athabasca deposit3 Expansion
is that it is the only one shallow enough to be116,300 bbl/d (18,490 m3/d)
suitable for surface mining. About 10% of the2006
Athabasca oil sands are covered by less thanOperating
75 metres (246 ft) of overburden. The mineable 
area as defined by the Alberta government3 Debottleneck
covers 37 contiguous townships (about46,500 bbl/d (7,390 m3/d)
3,400 km2/1,300 sq mi) north of the city of2011
Fort McMurray. The overburden consists of 1 to 3Announced
metres of water-logged muskeg on top of 0 to 
75 metres of clay and barren sand, while the4 Expansion
underlying oil sands are typically 40 to 60 metres139,500 bbl/d (22,180 m3/d)
thick and sit on top of relatively flat limestone2015
rock. As a result of the easy accessibility, theAnnounced
world's first oil sands mine was started by GreatSynenco Energy
Canadian Oil Sands Limited (a predecessorNorthern Lights
company of Suncor Energy) in 1967. The1
Syncrude mine (the biggest mine in the world at57,250 bbl/d (9,102 m3/d)
191 km2)[citation needed] followed in 1978, and2010
the Albian Sands mine (operated by Shell Canada)Applied for
in 2003. All three of these mines are associatedTotal S.A.
with bitumen upgraders that convert the unusableJoslyn
bitumen into synthetic crude oil for shipment to1
refineries in Canada and the United States. At50,000 bbl/d (7,900 m3/d)
Albian, the upgrader is located at Scotford,2013
439 km south. The bitumen, diluted with aApplied for
solvent is transferred there in a 610 millimetres 
(24 in) Corridor Pipeline.2
Bitumen extraction50,000 bbl/d (7,900 m3/d)
Main article: Oil sands#Extraction process2016
The original process for extraction of bitumenApplied for
from the sands was developed by Dr. Karl Clark, 
working with Alberta Research Council in the3
1920s. Today, all of the producers doing surface50,000 bbl/d (7,900 m3/d)
mining, such as Syncrude Canada, Suncor Energy2019
and Albian Sands Energy etc., use a variation ofAnnounced
the Clark Hot Water Extraction (CHWE) process. 
In this process, the ores are mined using open-pit4
mining technology. The mined ore is then crushed50,000 bbl/d (7,900 m3/d)
for size reduction. Hot water at 50 80 C is added2022
to the ore and the formed slurry is transportedAnnounced
using hydrotransport line to a primary separationUTS/Teck Cominco
vessel (PSV) where bitumen is recovered byEquinox
flotation as bitumen froth. The recovered bitumenLease 14
froth consists of 60% bitumen, 30% water and50,000 bbl/d (7,900 m3/d)
10% solids by weight. The recovered bitumen2014
froth needs to be cleaned to reject the containedPublic disclosure
solids and water to meet the requirement ofFrontier
downstream upgrading processes. Depending on1
the bitumen content in the ore, between 90 and100,000 bbl/d (16,000 m3/d)
100% of the bitumen can be recovered using2014
modern hot water extraction techniques. After oilPublic disclosure
extraction, the spent sand and other materials areRoyal Dutch Shell - misleading advertisement
then returned to the mine, which is eventuallyIn August 2008 the British Advertising Standards
reclaimed.Authority (ASA) ruled that Royal Dutch Shell had
More recently, in-situ methods like steam assistedmisled the public by claiming that its oil sands
gravity drainage (SAGD) and cyclic steamproject in Alberta was a "sustainable energy
stimulation (CSS) have been developed to extractsource". Although widely used, "sustainable" had
bitumen from deep deposits by injecting steam tobeen deemed a "vague" and "ambiguous" term, in
heat the sands and reduce the bitumen viscositylight of DEFRA's advice that companies should
so that it can be pumped out like conventionalavoid vague environmentally-friendly terms
crude oil.intended to simply give a good impression. They
The standard extraction process requires hugeconcluded the claim of sustainability was misleading
amounts of natural gas. Currently, the oil sands"[b]ecause we had not seen data that showed
industry uses about 4% of the Western Canadahow Shell was effectively managing carbon
Sedimentary Basin natural gas production. Byemissions from its oil sands projects in order to
2015, this may increase 2.5 fold.limit climate change".
According to the National Energy Board, it requiresSee also
about 1,200 cubic feet (34 m3) of natural gas toCanadian Centre for Energy Information
produce one barrel of bitumen from in situHistory of the petroleum industry in Canada (oil
projects and about 700 cubic feet (20 m3) forsands and heavy oil)
integrated projects. Since a barrel of oil equivalentMackenzie Valley Pipeline
is about 6,000 cubic feet (170 m3) of gas, thisUtah Oil Sands Joint Venture
represents a large gain in energy. That being theReferences
case, it is likely that Alberta regulators will reduce^ IHS CERA (May 18, 2009). "Oil Sands Move
exports of natural gas to the United States infrom the 'Fringe to Center' of Energy Supply".
order to provide fuel to the oil sands plants. AsRigZone. Retrieved 2009-05-19. 
gas reserves are exhausted, however, oil^ a b Andy Burrowes; Rick Marsh, Nehru Ramdin,
upgraders will likely turn to bitumen gasification toCurtis Evans (2007) (PDF). Alberta's Energy
generate their own fuel. In much the same wayReserves 2006 and Supply/Demand Outlook
the bitumen can be converted into synthetic2007-2016. ST98. Alberta Energy and Utilities
crude oil, it can also be converted into syntheticBoard. Retrieved 2008-04-12. 
natural gas.^ "Alberta's Oil Sands 2006" (PDF). Government
In-situ extraction on a commercial scale is justof Alberta. 2007. Retrieved 2008-02-17. 
beginning. A project nearing completion, the Long^ Mackenzie, Sir Alexander (1970). "The Journals
Lake Project, is designed to provide its own fuel,and Letters of Alexander Mackenzie". Edited by
by on-site hydrocracking of the bitumenW. Kaye Lamb. Cambridge: Hakluyt Society, pg.
extracted. Long Lake Phase 1 is extracting 13,000129, ISBN 0521010349
barrels/day of bitumen as of July 2008, ramping^ a b Hein, Francis J (2000). "Historical Overview
towards a target of 72,000 in late 2009. andof the Fort McMurray Area and Oil Sands Industry
"upgrading" of bitumen to liquid oil in 2007,in Northeast Alberta" (PDF). Earth Sciences Report
producing 60,000 bbl/day of usable oil. The2000-05. Alberta Geological Survey. Retrieved
hydrocracker is scheduled to complete2008-02-17. 
commissioning by September 2008.^ "Oil Sands History". Unlocking the Potential of
Environmental impactsthe Oil Sands. Syncrude. 2006. Retrieved
See also: Environmental issues surrounding oil2008-02-17. 
sands exploitation^ "Oil Sands". Alberta Energy. Alberta
Mining operations in the Athabasca oil sands.Government. 2008. Retrieved 2008-01-30. 
Image shows the Athabasca River about 600m^ "Oil sands & western Canadian
from the tailings pond. NASA Earth Observatoryconventional production, December 2008 interim
photo, 2009.update". Canadian Association of Petroleum
Critics contend that government and industryProducers. 2008-12-11. Retrieved 2009-01-03. 
measures taken to minimize environmental and^ Franklin, Sonja; Gismatullin, Eduard (2007-12-05).
health risks posed by large-scale mining operations"BP, Husky Energy agree to form oil-sands
are inadequate, causing damage to the naturalpartnerships". Bloomberg. Retrieved 2007-12-12. 
environment. Objective discussion of the^ Dutta, Ashok (2007-12-12). "ConocoPhillips aims
environmental impacts has often been clouded byhigh". Calgary Herald. Retrieved 2007-12-12. 
polarized arguments from industry and from^ Alberta, Employment, Immigration and Industry
advocacy groups.(December 2007). "Alberta Oil Sands Industry
LandUpdate" (PDF). Government of Alberta. Retrieved
Approximately 20% of Alberta's oil sands are2008-04-01. 
recoverable through open-pit mining, while 80%^ Albian Sands Announces Operator Agreement
require in situ extraction technologies (largelyNews Release, November 18, 2008
because of their depth). Open pit mining destroys^ Fort Hills Project page - Petro-Canada website
the boreal forest and muskeg. The Alberta^ Encana website on Oilsands projects
government requires companies to restore the^ a b ConocoPhillips - Canadian operations
land to "equivalent land capability". This means that^ Jacos homepage
the ability of the land to support various land uses^ Opti sells 15 per cent stake of oilsands joint
after reclamation is similar to what existed, butventure to Nexen for $735 million Yahoo Finance,
that the individual land uses may not necessarilyDec 17, 2008
be identical. In some particular circumstances the^ Nexen Clinches Additional Long Lake Interest
government considers agricultural land to befor $735MM - RigZone, Jan 27, 2008
equivalent to forest land. Oil sands companies^ Horizon project homepage
have reclaimed mined land to use as pasture for^ Devon Energy Obtains approval for Second
wood bison instead of restoring it to the originalJackfish Oil Sands Production Project -
boreal forest and muskeg. Syncrude asserts theyOilvoice.com, September 08, 2008
have reclaimed 22% of their disturbed land.^ Synenco & Sinopec Enter Deal for
WaterCanadian Oil Sands Project RigZone - May 31,
A Pembina Institute report stated "To produce2005
one cubic metre (m3) of synthetic crude oil (SCO)^ Synenco page regarding SinoCanada
(upgraded bitumen) in a mining operation requires^ [ Agreement to Buy Synenco Energy Inc. -
about 24.5 m3 of water (net figures). ApprovedTotal strengthens position in Canadian Heavy Oil] -
oil sands mining operations are currently licensedTotal E&P Canada News Release, April 28,
to divert 359 million m3 from the Athabasca2008
River, or more than twice the volume of water^ Kearl proposed project site - Imperialoil.ca
required to meet the annual municipal needs of^ a b BP Enters Canadian Oil Sands with Husky
the City of Calgary." and went on to say "...theEnergy - BP press release,December 5, 2007
net water requirement to produce a cubic metre^ Tucker project site
of oil with in situ (emphasis added) production^ Chevron finishes Ells river drilling - (by
may be as little as 0.2 m3, depending on howSchlumberger), March 30, 2007
much is recycled". Jeffrey Simpson of the Globe^ Terre de Grace project page - Value Creation
and Mail paraphrased this report, saying: "A cubicInc website
metre of oil, mined from the tar sands, needs^ Heavy Investment - Statoil arrives in the oil
two to 4.5 cubic metres of water.sands - WoodMackenzie, Upstream Insight, May
The Athabasca River runs 1,231 kilometres from2007
the Athabasca Glacier in west-central Alberta to^ S. Korea Buys Canadian Oil Sands Property -
Lake Athabasca in northeastern Alberta . Theredorbit.com, July 24, 2006
average annual flow just downstream of Fort^ "Operational excellence: the land we borrow".
McMurray is 633 cubic metres per second with itsRetrieved 2009-02-27. 
highest daily average measuring 1,200 cubic^ "Alberta Inventors and Inventionsarl Clark".
metres per second.Retrieved 2006-03-29. 
Water license allocations total about 1% of the^ Gu G, Xu Z, Nandakumar K, Masliyah JH. (2002)
Athabasca river average annual flow. Actual use in"Influence of water-soluble and water-insoluble
2006 was about 0.4%. In addition, the Albertanatural surface active components on the stability
government sets strict limits on how much waterof water-in-toluene-diluted bitumen emulsion", Fuel,
oil sands companies can remove from the81, pages 18591869.
Athabasca River. According to the Water^ R. J. Mikula, O. Omotoso and W. I. Friesen
Management Framework for the Lower(2007) "Interpretation of Bitumen Recovery Data
Athabasca River, during periods of low river flowfrom Batch Extraction Tests", Canadian Journal of
water consumption from the Athabasca River isChemical Engineering, v 85 n 5, pages 765-772.
limited to 1.3% of annual average flow. The^ "Canada Energy Future: Reference Case and
province of Alberta is also looking into cooperativeScenarios to 2030" Pages 45-48 ISBN
withdrawal agreements between oil sands978-0-662-46855-4
operators.^ "Questions and Answers". Canada's Oil
Natural gas use and greenhouse gasesSandspportunities and Challenges to 2015: An
The processing of bitumen into synthetic crudeUpdate. National Energy Board of Canada.
requires energy, and currently this energy is2007-06-30. Retrieved 2007-08-23. 
generated by burning natural gas, which releases^ Long Lake Project
carbon dioxide. In 2007, the oil sands used around^ "Operationsthabasca Oil Sandsong Lake
1 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day, aroundProjectroject Overview". Nexen Inc.. Retrieved
40% of Alberta's total usage. Based on gas2006-03-29. 
purchases, natural gas requirements are given by^ "Nexen Nods Positive Reservoir Performance at
the Canadian Energy Resource Institute as 2.14Long Lake" Nexen, 17 July 2008
GJ (2.04 mcf) per barrel for cyclic steam^ "Alberta Plan Fails to Protect Athabasca River".
stimulation projects, 1.08 GJ (1.03 mcf) per barrel^ "Alberta's tar sands are soaking up too much
for SAGD projects, 0.55 GJ (0.52 mcf) per barrelwater". The Globe and Mail (Dogwood Initiative).
for bitumen extraction in mining operations not2006-07-05.
including upgrading or 1.54 GJ (1.47 mcf) per barrel^ "'Conspiracy of silence' on tarsands, group
for extraction and upgrading in mining operations.says". CTV News. Retrieved 2008-02-16. 
The forecast growth in synthetic oil production in^ "Tar won't stick". Edmonton Journal. Retrieved
Alberta also threatens Canada's international2008-02-16. 
commitments. In ratifying the Kyoto Protocol,^ "Time for Ottawa to stop tiptoeing around
Canada agreed to reduce, by 2012, itsAlberta oilsands sensibilities". Oil Week. 2008-02-15.
greenhouse gas emissions by 6% with respect toRetrieved 2008-02-16.  (industry publication)
1990. In 2002, Canada's total greenhouse gas^ "Environmental Protection and Enhancement".
emissions had increased by 24% since 1990. OilAlberta Environment.
Sands production contributed 3.4% of Canada's^ "Syncrude Land Reclamation". Syncrude Canada.
greenhouse gas emissions in 2003.2006. Retrieved 2009-08-07. 
Ranked as the world's eighth largest emitter of^ "Troubled Waters, Troubling Trends". The
greenhouse gases, Canada is a relatively largePembina Institute. May 2006. (advocacy)
emitter given its population and is missing its^ "Primer". Environment Canada.
Kyoto targets. A major Canadian initiative called^ "Athabasca river water management
the Integrated CO2 Network (ICO2N) hasframework".
proposed a system for the large scale capture,^ "Typical River Flows". Environment Canada.
transport and storage of carbon dioxide (CO2).Retrieved 2008-12-13. 
ICO2N members represent a group of industry^ "Environmental Aspects of Oil Sands
participants providing a framework for carbonDevelopment-Backgrounder" (PDF). Canadian
capture and storage development in Canada,Association of Petroleum Producers. Retrieved
initially using it to enhance oil recovery. Nuclear2008-12-13. 
power has also been proposed as a means of^ "Athabasca River Water Management
generating the required energy without releasingFramework". Alberta Environment.
green house gases.^ "Enhancing Resilience in a Changing Climate,
PopulationWater Supply for Canada's Oil Sands". Natural
The Athabasca oil sands are located in theResources Canada.
northeastern portion of the Canadian province of^ McColl, David; Slagorsky, Martin (November
Alberta, near the city of Fort McMurray. The area2008). Canadian Oil Sands Supply Costs and
is only sparsely populated, and in the late 1950s, itDevelopment Projects. Canadian Energy Research
was primarily a wilderness outpost of a fewInstitute. ISBN 1896091830. 
hundred people whose main economic activities^ "Section 2 Crude Bitumen" Alberta Energy
included fur trapping and salt mining. From aResources Board Graphs and Data (Powerpoint
population of 37,222 in 1996, the boomtown offile)
Fort McMurray and the surrounding region (known^ Top 50 countries by greenhouse gas emissions
as the Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo) grewReuters
to 79,810 people as of 2006, including a "shadow^ "Carbon Capture and Storage" 30 November
population" of 10,442 living in work camps, leaving2007.
the community struggling to provide services and^ Planning and Development Department (2006).
housing for migrant workers, many of them from"Municipal Census 2006" (PDF). Regional Municipality
Eastern Canada, especially Newfoundland. Fortof Wood Buffalo. Retrieved 2008-02-06. 
McMurray ceased to be an incorporated city in^ "Urban Service Areas". Unincorporated Places.
1995 and is now an urban service area withinAlberta Population. 2008. Retrieved 2008-02-06. 
Wood Buffalo.^ Department of Energy, Alberta (June 2006). "Oil
Estimated oil reservesSands Fact Sheets". Retrieved 2007-04-11. 
The Alberta government's Energy and Utilities^ Canada, Statistics (April 5, 2007). "Latest
Board (EUB) estimated in 2007 that aboutrelease from the labour force survey". Retrieved
173 billion barrels (27.510^9 m3) of crude2007-04-11. 
bitumen are economically recoverable from the^ a b NEB (June 2006) (PDF). Canada's Oil Sands
three Alberta oil sands areas based on benchmarkOpportunities and Challenges to 2015: An Update.
WTI market prices of $62 per barrel in 2006,National Energy Board of Canada. Retrieved
rising to a projected $69 per barrel in 2016 using2006-10-30. 
current technology. This was equivalent to about^ Nikiforuk, Andrew (2006-06-04). "The downside
10% of the estimated 1,700 billion barrelsof boom: Alberta's manpower shortage". Canadian
(27010^9 m3) of bitumen-in-place. In fact WTIBusiness magazine. Retrieved 2006-10-30. 
prices topped $133 in May 2008. Alberta^ Statistics Canada (2006-09-14). Study: The
estimated that the Athabasca deposits aloneAlberta economic juggernaut. Statistics Canada.
contain 35 billion barrels (5.610^9 m3) of surfaceRetrieved 2006-10-30. 
mineable bitumen and 98 billion barrels^ Enbridge and PetroChina Sign Gateway Pipeline
(15.610^9 m3) of bitumen recoverable by in-situCooperation Agreement | Business Wire | Find
methods. These estimates of Canada's reservesArticles at BNET
were doubted when they were first published but^
are now largely accepted by the international oil^
industry. This volume placed Canadian proven^ Financial Post Articleboriginal implication in the
reserves second in the world behind those ofproject
Saudi Arabia.^ Oil Sands Projects Oilsands Discovery
Syncrude's Mildred Lake mine site and plant^ Synenco conference transcript
The method of calculating economically^ Wojciech Moskwa (2007-04-27). "Statoil to buy
recoverable reserves that produced theseNorth American Oil Sands for 2 bln". Financial Post.
estimates was adopted because conventionalRetrieved 2007-12-09. 
methods of accounting for reserves gave^ Shell rapped by ASA for 'greenwash' advert -
increasingly meaningless numbers. They made itguardian.co.uk, August 13, 2008
appear that Alberta was running out of oil at aExternal links
time when rapid increases in oil sands productionAlberta Oil Sands: Key Issues and Impacts
were more than offsetting declines in conventionalOnEarth Magazine  Canada's Highway to Hell
oil, and in fact most of Alberta's oil production isMud, Sweat and Tearsuardian Newspaper, 2007
now unconventional oil. Conventional estimates ofHugh McCullum, Fuelling Fortress America: A
oil reserves are really calculations of the geologicalReport on the Athabasca Tar Sands and U.S.
risk of drilling for oil, but in the oil sands there isDemands for Canada's Energy (The Parkland
very little geological risk because they outcrop onInstitute)xecutive SummaryDownload report
the surface and are easy to locate. With the oilOil Sands Historyyncrude Canada
price increases since 2003, the economic risk ofOil Sands Discovery Centreort McMurray Tourism
low oil prices was reduced.The Trillion-Barrel Tar Pitrticle from December
The Alberta estimates only assume a recovery2004 Wired.
rate of around 20% of bitumen-in-place, whereasOil Sands Reviewister publication to Oilweek
oil companies using the steam assisted gravityMagazine
drainage (SAGD) method of extracting bitumenAlberta's Oil Sandslberta Department of Energy
report that they can recover over 60% with littleAlberta's Reserves 2005 and Supply/Demand
effort.Outlook 2006-2015lberta Energy and Utilities Board
Only 3% of the initial established crude bitumen2006-06-15
reserves have been produced since commercialCanada's Oil Sandspportunities and Challenges to
production started in 1967. At rate of production2015: An Updateune 2006ational Energy Board of
projected for 2015, about 3 million barrels perCanada
day (48010^3 m3/d), the Athabasca oil sandsOilsands overview- Canadian Centre for Energy
reserves would last over 170 years. HoweverInformation
those production levels require an influx ofAlberta Plan Fails to Protect Athabasca River
workers into an area that until recently wasMegaprojects
largely uninhabited. By 2007 this need in northern"Energy Statistics Handbook" (February 2008)
Alberta drove unemployment rates in Alberta andStatistics Canada ISSN 1496-4600
adjacent British Columbia to the lowest levels inAlastair Sweeny, History of the Oilsands to 1914
history. As far away as the Atlantic Provinces,(French) Du sable dans l'engrenage tv document
where workers were leaving to work in Alberta,by Guy Gendron and Jean-Luc Paquette describing
unemployment rates fell to levels not seen forthe Athabasca oil sands issues.
over one hundred years.Further reading
The Venezuelan Orinoco Oil Sands site mayKunzig, Robert (March 2009). "The Canadian Oil
contain more oil sands than Athabasca. However,Boom: Scraping Bottom". National Geographic 215
while the Orinoco deposits are less viscous and(3): 3859. Retrieved 29 May 2009. v  d  e
more easily produced using conventionalWestern Canadian Sedimentary Basin
techniques (the Venezuelan government prefersHydrocarbon history
to call them "extra-heavy oil"), they are too deepOil sands and heavy oil  Frontier exploration and
to access by surface mining.development  Natural gas liquids  Natural gas
EconomicsDepositional Regions
Despite the large reserves, the cost of extractingSouthern Alberta  Central Alberta  Northwestern
the oil from bituminous sands has historically madeAlberta Plains  South-central Canadian Rockies
production of the oil sands unprofitablehe cost offoothills  North-east Plains  North-central
selling the extracted crude would not cover thefoothills  Liard River  Fort Nelson  Northern
direct costs of recovery; labour to mine theRocky Mountains  Fort St.